Sunday, November 4, 2007

Larry Lessig on Supercapitalism


Larry Lessig's Blog has a rich review of Robert Reich's new book, Supercapitalism, and a very interesting string of comments.

Here is an excerpt:

Reich says we have entered a period of Supercapitalism -- a time when competition has grown dramatically, and when half of us (meaning half of each of us, or at least half) more effectively demand lower prices in the product and service market place and higher returns in the investment market place. This hyper competition is forcing extraordinary rationalization in both markets. Wal-Marts and an exploding stock market are the consequence. The half of us that lives in the product/service and investment markets have been rewarded by this competition. Supercapitalism is producing super-efficiency, at least here.

The problem, from Reich's (and my) perspective, is that the other half of us - the part that thinks not as an actor in a market, but as a citizen - has atrophied. That is, the half of us (again, of each of us - Reich's point is that each of us has these two parts) that demands that government set sensible and efficient limits on private action has atrophied. Deep skepticism about government has made most of us turn away from it as a tool of sensible policy making. We instead (and this is a truly brilliant part of the book) turn to corporations to make good policy in government's stead. We push for "corporate social responsibility" and praise corporations who agree to do the "good" thing, imagining that this means something other than the "money making" thing. This, Reich says, is "politics diverted" - trusting companies to do good policy rather than getting government to set good policy, imagining "corporate social responsibility" will produce something different from corporations maximizing profits.

1 comment:

Brian Burtt said...

Responding to you, Len, even though I realize these are Lessig's comments.

Maybe some of this is that we Gen-Xers don't share (your?) Boomer idealism. We realize (with our noted cynicm) that it's nothing new that corporations are inextricably entwined with the government, and ever have been. That policy is made (and ever has been--people seem not to realize how influential among the Founders was Alexander Hamilton) on Wall St., and merely dictated to Pennsylvania Avenue and the Hill.

The whole thing about "corporate responsibility" is probably not the best strategy. But it does seem like this is the right enemy, no?